CRT-100.84 Complete Versus Culprit-Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multi-Vessel Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Muhammad Khalid,Abdul Ahad Khan,Ghulam Murtaza,Jayant Bagai,Madhan Shanmugasundaram,Timir K. Paul

CRT-100.84 Complete Versus Culprit-Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multi-Vessel Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

2020

Muhammad Khalid
Abdul Ahad Khan
Ghulam Murtaza
Jayant Bagai
Madhan Shanmugasundaram
Timir K. Paul

Studies comparing outcomes between complete revascularization (CR) versus culprit-vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention (CV-PCI) in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) without cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI

Keywords:

Culprit
Internal medicine
Cardiology
Myocardial infarction
Medicine
Cardiogenic shock
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Coronary artery disease
ST segment
Randomized controlled trial
Revascularization

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations