Application of a cooperative learning approach for training residents in the emergency department and comparison with a traditional approach

Objectives To analyze the benefits of using a cooperative learning (CL) model to teach hospital residents doing rotations in the emergency department and to compare the CL approach to traditional training. Material and methods Two training sessions on the same content were given by 2 expert instructors. A traditional method of instruction was used in one of the sessions and the CL model was used in the other. Immediately after the sessions and 3 months later, the residents took a multiple-choice test that was developed by a third expert. A control group of residents who had not attended either session also took the test. Results Twenty-one residents were in the CL group and 17 were in the traditional-training group. The mean (SD) scores on the examinations immediately after training were 8.81 (1.40) and 7.88 (1.26), in the CL and traditional groups, respectively (P=.0414). Three months later, the mean scores of these same residents retaking the examination and 32 control residents were as follows: CL group, 8.19 (1.12); traditional group, 7.00 (1.22); and control group, 6.37 (1.37) (P .05, traditional vs control). Conclusion The CL approach proved superior to traditional training in terms of short- and medium-term retention of information. Although this is the first analysis of CL in this type of specialized medical training, extending its use in preparing medical residents working in emergency departments would seem to be justified.