266. Angiotensin-II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) display opposite fusion rates in cervical spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Approximately 132,000 patients per year undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the United States. Although the utilization of instrumentation and bone graft alternatives has enhanced fusion rates, pseudarthrosis remains a problem, with incidence rates up to 56%. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) modulators are typically used to treat arterial hypertension, which affects 50-80% of spinal fusion patients. Recent evidence suggests an association between RAS blockers and bone metabolism, particularly in the context of bone healing. In addition, preclinical and clinical studies have suggested a potential correlation between the use of RAS blockers and reduced osteoporotic fracture risk. PURPOSE We aimed to determine whether there was a correlation between the use of antihypertensive medication, particularly angiotensin-II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE Degenerative disc disease patients who underwent ACDF. OUTCOME MEASURES Spinal fusion status and neurological function (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] and Nurick grading scales. METHODS A cohort of adult patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease who were operated upon using an allograft implant, and with a 1-year minimum follow-up was considered eligible. Information on demographic data, comorbidities (especially hypertension status), antihypertensive medication, neurological examination and fusion status were collected. Fusion criteria in static radiographs were increased opacification and bridging trabecular bone at the margins of the graft. In dynamic radiographs, fusion criteria were interspinous motion of RESULTS A total of 178 patients with cervical degenerative disc disease who underwent ACDF, with a median age of 53.7 (range 24-90) years, were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 21.7 months. Out of the 82 hypertensive patients who were identified, 77 (93.9%) were taking antihypertensive drugs (28 [36.4%] received ARBs and 27 [35.1%] received ACEIs). The overall pooled fusion rate was 69.5%. Patients treated with ARBs exhibited a higher fusion rate compared to those who were untreated (88.9% vs 69.7%, respectively, p=.04). By contrast, patients treated with ACEIs displayed a lower fusion rate than untreated patients (45.8% vs 69.7%, respectively, p=.02). Comparisons between successful fusion and failed fusion groups identified treatment with ACEIs as risk factors for the development of pseudarthrosis. Treatment with ARBs displayed a trend towards being a favorable factor for fusion (RR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0, 1.5). In the multivariate nominal logistic analysis, ARB (p=.02) treatment remained an independent risk and beneficial factor, respectively, for fusion. CONCLUSIONS In our retrospective study of a cohort of ACDF patients, treatment with ARBs was associated with an increased fusion rate, while treatment with ACEIs identified as risk factor for failed fusion. Further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to verify the beneficial effects of ARBs and deleterious influence of ACEIs on spinal fusion. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.