Ranitidine and cimetidine in the healing of duodenal ulcer: meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials

SUMMARY All available ranitidine and cimetidine comparative trials in acute duodenal ulcer disease were examined: of the 44 trials, 36 favoured ranitidine, and there was an overall difference in ulcer healing of 7%. Further stratification enabled examination of trials with common attributes: the most frequent endoscopic assessment was at 4 weeks to compare ranitidine 150 mg twice daily with cimetidine 1 g day−1 or 400 mg b.d. Twenty of these trials had sufficient data to permit pooling. Ranitidine was favoured in 18/20 trials and in three the differences achieved statistical significance. Results of the trials were combined using meta-analysis to calculate differences in ulcer healing. Most studies had sample sizes that were insufficient to detect clinically-important differences; the power to detect a 20% difference was less than 80% in 15/20 trials, and for a 10% difference was less than 80% in all but one trial. Fifteen trials compared ranitidine 150 mg b.d. with cimetidine 1 g day−1: healing after 4 weeks therapy was overall 6% greater for ranitidine. This was statistically significant (P < 0.05) and the combined total number of patients had a power of 83% to detect this difference. In five trials the dose of cimetidine used was 400 mg b.d.: the 12% difference in healing in favour of ranitidine 150 mg b.d. was statistically significant, and the combined trials had a power of 95% to detect this difference. Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily heals significantly more duodenal ulcers after 4 weeks of therapy than either cimetidine 400 mg b.d. or cimetidine 1 g day−1.