Clinician needs and perceptions about cardioneuroablation for recurrent vasovagal syncope: An international clinician survey

Background Cardioneuroablation (CNA) targets the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system ganglionated plexi located in the peri-atrial epicardial fat. There is increasing interest in CNA as a treatment of vasovagal syncope (VVS), despite no randomized clinical trial (RCT) data. Objective The purpose of this study was to poll the opinion on CNA) for VVS. Methods A REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) survey was administered to international physicians treating patients with VVS on their opinion about patient selection criteria, ablation approach, RCT design, and most appropriate end points for CNA procedures. Results The survey was completed by 118 physicians; 86% were cardiac electrophysiologists. The majority of respondents (79%) would consider referring a patient with refractory VVS for CNA, and 27% have performed CNA for VVS themselves. Most felt patient selection should require a head-up tilt test with a cardioinhibitory response (67%) and suggest a minimum age of 18 years with a median of 3 (interquartile range 2–5) episodes in the past year. There were differences in patient selection between physicians who have performed CNA themselves and those who have not. The majority felt that the ablation strategy should include both atria (70%) with an anatomical approach in combination with autonomic stimulation (85%). Performing a sham procedure in the control arm was supported by 56% of respondents, providing equipoise in RCT design. The preferred primary outcome was freedom from syncope within 1 year of follow-up. Conclusion There is widespread support for well-designed RCTs to confirm the hypothesized clinical benefit of CNA, provide data to guide the risk-benefit equations during patient selection, and appropriately estimate the placebo effect.