Measuring Democratic Political Culture in Latin America
2015
This chapter seeks to analyze the connection between micro-level attitudes and
regime stability in Latin America. The connection between political culture and
democracy has been a concern of social scientists since Gabriel Almond and
Sidney Verba’s 1963 breakthrough book, The Civic Culture, identified a cluster
of attitudes and values that, they argued, led to stable democracies (Almond and
Verba 1963). Ronald Inglehart subsequently pioneered cross-national research
that built on, and empirically tested, Almond and Verba’s assertions. In his
model, the prevalence of a few specific individual attitudes and values-overall
life satisfaction, interpersonal trust, and a disdain for revolutionary changestrongly increased the likelihood that democracy would persist in any given
country (Inglehart 1990). Other scholars such as Edward Muller and Mitchell
Seligson argued that Inglehart had it backwards: democratic experience causes
the development of civic culture-or, at the very least, there is a reciprocal
relationship (Muller and Seligson 1994). Parallel to this debate over civic culture,
political scientists have also been arguing over the concept of “social capital.”
In Robert Putnam’s 1993 study of regional governments in Italy, he finds that
what best explains the performance of democratic institutions is not socioeconomic development but rather “civic community”: participation in public
affairs, conditions of political equality, norms of trust and solidarity, and above
all the existence of a vibrant civil society. Taken together, Putnam dubs these
individual and collective civic attributes “social capital” (Putnam 1993). For
some scholars, however, Latin America lacks the requisite pattern of beliefs to
sustain democratic governance (Wiarda 2001).
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
1
References
2
Citations
NaN
KQI