A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Consolidation With a Single Dose Of 90y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin®) (Z) Vs. Maintenance With Rituximab (R) For Two Years In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Responding To R-CHOP. Preliminary Results At 36 Months From Randomization

Armando López Guillermo,Miguel Canales,Ivan Dlouhy,Javier Briones,Dolores Caballero,Juan Manuel Sancho,Santiago Mercadal-Vilchez,José M. Moraleda,María-José Terol,Antonio Salar,Luis Palomera,S. Gardella,Isidro Jarque,Secundino Ferrer,Joan Bargay,Andrés López,Carlos Panizo,Anna Muntañola,Carlos Montalban,Eulogio Conde,Miguel T. Hernandez,Alfons Soler,J. Marin,José-Antonio García-Marco,Guillermo Deben,José-Francisco Tomás

A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Consolidation With a Single Dose Of 90y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin®) (Z) Vs. Maintenance With Rituximab (R) For Two Years In Patients With Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Responding To R-CHOP. Preliminary Results At 36 Months From Randomization

2013

![Graphic][1] Patients with FL can have long time of survival, but disease progression typically occurs 3-5 years after initial treatment. Consolidation with Z after initial therapy has shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) mainly in the pre-R era, whereas maintenance with R also has demonstrated a substantial benefit in terms of PFS in patients treated with immunochemotherapy. In this setting, the Spanish intergroup PETHEMA/GELTAMO/GELCAB started a randomized phase 2 trial in order to compare the use of consolidation with Z vs. R maintenance in patients with FL responding to R-CHOP. From June 2008 to July 2010, 146 patients (66M/80F; median age, 55 years) were enrolled from 25 Spanish institutions in the randomized phase 2 trial ZAR2007 (ClinicalTrials.gov, number [NCT00662948][2]). Main inclusion criteria were: FL grade 1, 2 or 3a, age 18-75 years, stages II-IV and need of treatment according to modified GELF criteria. Patients with FL grade 3b or transformed to DLBCL were excluded. In addition, patients with platelet count 25% before randomization were also excluded. Main end-point of the trial was PFS from randomization. The distribution according to the FLIPI score was as follows: low-risk 14%, intermediate 47%, and high 39%. After R-CHOP, 124 patients in CR (n=56), CR\[u\] (13) or PR (55) were randomized 1:1 (stratified by response) to arm A (90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan 0.4 mCi/kg IV; total dose of 90Y was capped at 32 mCi) vs. arm B (1 infusion of R 375 mg/m2 every 8 weeks for 2 years). Sixty three (51%) patients were assigned to arm A (Z) and 61 (49%) to arm B (R). Twenty two patients were not randomized due to response

Keywords:

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations