Improving the Understanding and the Reliability of the Concept of "Sufficiency" in Friction Ridge Examination

The National Academies has stressed the need to develop quantifiable measures for methods that are currently qualitative in nature, such as the examination of fingerprints. Current protocols and procedures to perform these examinations rely heavily on a succession of subjective decisions, from the initial acceptance of evidence for probative value to the final assessment of forensic results. This project studied the concept of sufficiency associated with the decisions made by latent print examiners at the end of the various phases of the examination process. During this 2-year effort, a web‐based interface was designed to capture the observations of 146 latent print examiners and trainees on 15 pairs of latent/control prints. Two main findings resulted from the study: The concept of sufficiency is driven mainly by the number and spatial relationships between the minutiae observed on the latent and control prints. Data indicate that demographics (training, certification, years of experience) or non‐minutiae based features (such as level 3 features) do not play a major role in examiners' decisions; Significant variability was observed between detecting and interpreting friction ridge features and at all levels of details, as well as for factors that have the potential to influence the examination process, such as degradation, distortion, or influence of the background and the development technique.