The common sense of economics and divergent approaches in economic thought: a view from Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit
2021
This paper evaluates the contribution of Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit to the development of
economic theory in the 20th century. Our argument in this paper is twofold. First, we contend that
this book embodied what had been the common knowledge of early neoclassical economics prior
to WWII. Secondly, we also argue that embroynic to Knight’s account of economics were two
divergent approaches to economic thought that emerged after WWII. The first approach, what has
come to be known as microeconomics, is characterized by utility maximization under fixed price,
income, and institutional parameters that approximate equilibrium. This first approach is distinct
from a second approach, referred to as price theory, in which prices are not sufficient statistics, as
in microeconomics, but operate as guides to consumption and production decisions under
alternative institutional arrangements. This second approach not only represented the continuation
of the mainline of economic thought from its classical and early neoclassical roots. It also
embodies the basis for Knight’s understanding of uncertainty, profit and entrepreneurship, as well
as its implications for economic organization and social progress.
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
49
References
1
Citations
NaN
KQI