Survival of infants treated with CKRT: comparing adapted adult platforms with the Carpediem™.

BACKGROUND The most severely ill neonates and infants with AKI who need kidney replacement therapy have had to rely upon peritoneal dialysis, or adaptations of veno-venous continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) devices for adults. Data from the Prospective Pediatric CRRT (ppCRRT) registry observed children 10 kg (44% vs. 64%, p < 0.001). A CKRT device designed specifically for small children could improve outcomes. The Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine (CARPEDIEM™) is specifically dedicated to providing CKRT for newborns and small infants. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis comparing patient severity of illness and outcomes between the ppCRRT and CARPEDIEM registries, involving 6 Italian pediatric intensive care units. Thirty-eight subjects from the CARPEDIEM registry and 84 subjects from the ppCRRT registry < 10 kg were screened for comparison. We compared patient outcomes with a weight-matched cohort (< 5 kg) of 34 patients from the CARPEDIEM registry and 48 patients from the ppCRRT registry. RESULTS The ppCRRT subjects had higher rates of vasoactive medication at CKRT initiation. Survival to CKRT termination was higher for CARPEDIEM subjects (33/34 vs. 21/48, p < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that CARPEDIEM registry cohort was the only variable to retain an association with survival to CKRT discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS We suggest children receiving CKRT using CARPEDIEM have excellent survival. Our data should be interpreted with caution given the retrospective comparison across two eras more than a decade apart.