Comparison of the Near Field/Far Field Model and the Advanced Reach Tool (ART) Model V1.5: Exposure Estimates to Benzene During Parts Washing with Mineral Spirits

Abstract The Advanced Reach Tool V1.5 (ART) is a mathematical model for occupational exposures conceptually based on, but implemented differently than, the “classic” Near Field/Far Field (NF/FF) exposure model. The NF/FF model conceptualizes two distinct exposure “zones”; the near field, within approximately 1 m of the breathing zone, and the far field, consisting of the rest of the room in which the exposure occurs. ART has been reported to provide “realistic and reasonable worst case” estimates of the exposure distribution. In this study, benzene exposure during the use of a metal parts washer was modeled using ART V1.5, and compared to actual measured workers samples and to NF/FF model results from three previous studies. Next, the exposure concentrations expected to be exceeded 25%, 10% and 5% of the time for the exposure scenario were calculated using ART. Lastly, ART exposure estimates were compared with and without Bayesian adjustment. The modeled parts washing benzene exposure scenario included distinct tasks, e.g. spraying, brushing, rinsing and soaking/drying. Because ART can directly incorporate specific types of tasks that are part of the exposure scenario, the present analysis identified each task’s determinants of exposure and performance time, thus extending the work of the previous three studies where the process of parts washing was modeled as one event. The ART 50th percentile exposure estimate for benzene (0.425 ppm) more closely approximated the reported measured mean value of 0.50 ppm than the NF/FF model estimates of 0.33 ppm, 0.070 ppm or 0.2 ppm obtained from other modeling studies of this exposure scenario. The ART model with the Bayesian analysis provided the closest estimate to the measured value (0.50 ppm). ART (with Bayesian adjustment) was then used to assess the 75th, the 90th and 95th percentile exposures, predicting that on randomly selected days during this parts washing exposure scenario, 25% of the benzene exposures would be above 0.70 ppm; 10% above 0.95 ppm; and 5% above 1.15 ppm. These exposure estimates at the three different percentiles of the ART exposure distribution refer to the modeled exposure scenario not a specific workplace or worker. This study provides a detailed comparison of modeling tools currently available to occupational hygienists and other exposure assessors. Possible applications are considered.