Differing Resuscitation With Aortic Occlusion in a Swine Junctional Hemorrhage Polytrauma Model.

Abstract Background Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) have received much attention in recent as methods for temporary control of junctional hemorrhage. Previous studies typically used the animal's shed blood for resuscitation. With current interest in moving REBOA to prehospital environment, this study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic and metabolic responses to different resuscitation fluids used with these devices. Methods In swine (Sus scrofa), shock was induced using a controlled hemorrhage, femur fracture, and uncontrolled hemorrhage from the femoral artery. Infrarenal REBOA or AAJT was deployed for 60 min during which the arterial injury was repaired. Animals were resuscitated with 15 mL/kg of shed whole blood (SWB) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or 30 mL/kg of a balanced crystalloid (PlasmaLyte). Results Animals in the AAJT and REBOA groups did not show any measurable differences in hemodynamics, metabolic responses, or survival with AAJT or REBOA treatment; hence, the data are pooled and analyzed among the three resuscitative fluids. SWB, FFP, and PlasmaLyte groups did not have a difference in survival time or overall survival. The animals in the SWB and FFP groups maintained higher blood pressure after resuscitation, (P  Conclusions After 60 min, infrarenal REBOA or AAJT aortic occlusion SWB and FFP resuscitation provided better blood pressure support with half of the resuscitative volume of PlasmaLyte. Swine resuscitated with SWB and FFP also had a more favorable coagulation profile. These data suggest that whole blood or component therapy should be used for resuscitation in conjunction with REBOA or AAJT, and administration of these fluids should be considered if prehospital device use is pursued.