Utility and limitation of treadmill exercise echocardiography for detecting significant coronary stenosis in infarct-related arteries in patients with healed myocardial infarction.

This clinical study examines the diagnostic accuracy of exercise echocardiography for detecting significant coronary stenoses in infarct-related arteries in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Quantitative coronary angiography and exercise echocardiography using treadmill testing were performed within 2 weeks of each other in 123 patients with a prior myocardial infarction. Coronary lumen diameter stenosis ≥50% by quantitative coronary angiography and the lack of a hyperdynamic response on exercise echocardiography was considered significant. For detection of infarct-related coronary lesions, treadmill exercise echocardiography was highly sensitive (91%) but less specific (59%) than for detection of non-infarct-related artery lesions. The 2 groups of patients with large and small infarct sites had similar sensitivity for detection of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery (88% vs 96%, p = NS); however, the specificity of the small infarct sites for this purpose was significantly higher than that of the large infarct sites (86% vs 33%, p <0.01). When remote ischemia was detected on exercise echocardiography, the specificity of exercise echocardiography was significantly lower (33% vs 70%, p <0.05) than when remote ischemia was not present. Thus, although there is high sensitivity, the specificity of treadmill exercise echocardiography for detecting infarct-related artery lesions is limited. However, high specificity is maintained when the infarct size is small and/or remote ischemia is not present.