Evaluation of gene-technological and conventional methods in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Abstract To find reliable methods able to identify the “difficult” Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, an in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for pneumolysin gene (Ply-PCR) and a commercial RNA hybridisation test (AccuProbe™) were evaluated. Selected isolates of suspected pneumococci, sent for confirmation of identification and for serotyping, were classified into four groups based on their optochin sensitivity and capsule reaction. All isolates in Group 1, which consisted of 24 typical, optochin-sensitive, encapsulated pneumococcal strains, were positive in the Ply-PCR and AccuProbe™ tests. In Group 2, which consisted of 25 optochin-sensitive, but unencapsulated pneumococcal strains, all the isolates were positive in the Ply-PCR test, and 23 were positive in the AccuProbe™ test. In Group 3, which consisted of 15 atypical, optochin-resistant but encapsulated pneumococci, 12 of the isolates were positive in the Ply-PCR and 12 in the AccuProbe™ test, and 11 of these 12 strains were positive in both tests. In Group 4, which consisted of 36 equivocal optochin-resistant, unencapsulated isolates, 15 strains were positive in the Ply-PCR test and 8 strains in the AccuProbe™ test. As a conclusion, the Ply-PCR and AccuProbe™ tests identified similarly typical optochin-sensitive pneumococci, but gave partly controversial results about atypical pneumococci. Thus, they did not reliably help in the identification of suspected pneumococcal isolates lacking the conventional characteristics of pneumococcus.