[Comparison of the visual quality at 1 year following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism].

Objective: To investigate mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) and high-order aberrations after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK), wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK (WF-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia and astigmatism. Methods: In this case-control study, 212 eyes of 108 patients with myopia and astigmatism from September 2014 to September 2016 were treated by refractive surgery. There were 34 males (66 eyes) and 74 females (146 = eyes), aged 27 (24, 32) years. They were divided into 3 groups, with 37 patients (71 eyes), 35 patients (69 eyes) and 36 patients (72 eyes) treated by FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK and SMILE, respectively. Refraction diopters, corneal tomography, wavefront aberrations and contrast sensitivity were evaluated before and at 12 months after surgery. The results of different groups were compared by rank sum test. Results: At 12 = months of follow-up, 69 eyes (97.18%) treated by FS-LASIK, 67 eyes (97.10%) by WF-LASIK and 69 eyes (95.83%) by SMILE had the uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Fifty-nine eyes (83.10%) treated by FS-LASIK, 60 eyes (86.96%) by WF-LASIK and 61 eyes (84.72%) by SMILE had better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity than preoperative corrected distance visual acuity. Surface regularity index of the WF-LASIK group decreased from 0.11 (0.07, 0.28) to 0.07 (0.06, 0.20) (Z=-2.662, P=0.008), which was less than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-3.236, -3.118, P=0.001, 0.000). Surface asymmetry index of the WF-LASIK group increased from 0.34 (0.25, 0.43) to 0.38 (0.30, 0.52) (Z=-2.140, P=0.032), which was less than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-2.910, -3.779, P=0.004, 0.000). The root mean square of high-order of the FS-LASIK group increased from 0.32 (0.27, 0.41) to 0.53 (0.40, 0.65) (Z=-6.228, P=0.000), which was more than that of the WF-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-3.595, -4.806, P=0.000, 0.000). Coma of the WF-LASIK group increased from 0.16 (0.11, 0.24) to 0.26 (0.15, 0.37) (Z=-3.816, P=0.000), which was less than that of the FS-LASIK group (Z=-3.528, P=0.000). Spherical aberration of the FS-LASIK and WF-LASIK groups increased from 0.10 (0.05, 0.21) and 0.08 (0.04, 0.12) to 0.24 (0.13, 0.34) and 0.15 (0.09, 0.26), respectively (Z=-5.141, -4.864, P=0.000, 0.000), which were more than that of the SMILE group (Z=-2.549, -4.682, P=0.011, 0.000). CS of the WF-LASIK group at 12 cycles per degree (c/d) increased from 1.34 (1.18, 1.48) to 1.48 (1.34, 1.63) (Z=-2.985, P=0.003), which was more than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-3.194, -2.977, P=0.001, 0.003). CS with glare of the WF-LASIK group at 12.0 c/d increased from 1.26 (1.18, 1.34) to 1.34 (1.34, 1.63) (Z=-3.608, P=0.000), which was more than that of the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups (Z=-4.033, -2.913, P=0.000, 0.004). Conclusions: FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK and SMILE achieved ideal visual outcomes at 12 months postoperatively. WF-LASIK treated eyes showed the best corneal symmetry, the least increase of high-order aberrations and the best visual quality among three kinds of surgeries. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56: 118-125).