Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Females: Insight from the MAGIC-AF Trial.

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is less frequently performed in women when compared to men. There is conflicting data on the safety and efficacy of AF ablation in women. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes in a contemporary cohort of men and women undergoing persistent AF ablation procedures. Methods and Results One hundred and eighty-two men and fifty-three women undergoing a first-ever persistent AF catheter ablation procedure in The Modified Ablation Guided by Ibutilide Use in Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (MAGIC-AF) trial were evaluated. Clinical and procedural characteristics were compared between each gender. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 1-year single procedure freedom from atrial arrhythmia off anti-arrhythmic drugs. Women undergoing catheter ablation procedures were older than men (p<0.001). The duration of AF and associated co-morbidities were similar between both genders. Single procedure drug-free atrial arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 53% of the cohort with no difference based on gender (men = 54%, women = 53%; p = 1.0). Procedural (p = 0.04), fluoroscopic (p = 0.02) and ablation times (p = 0.003) were shorter in women compared to men. Peri-procedural complications and post-ablation improvement in quality of life were similar between men and women. Conclusion Women undergoing a first-ever persistent AF ablation procedure were older but had similar clinical outcomes and complications when compared with men. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved