Clinical impact of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus and determination of methicillin resistance from positive blood cultures

Abstract The full identification and susceptibility profile of staphylococci from positive blood cultures (BCs) generally takes 24–48 h using phenotypic methods. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical impact of a real-time PCR strategy for rapid identification of staphylococci and determination of methicillin resistance directly from positive BCs. During a 12-month period, 250 episodes of positive BCs with organism morphology resembling staphylococci were enrolled. Two strategies were compared: conventional ( n = 128) using standard phenotypic methods or rapid ( n = 122) using a real-time PCR assay that is able to detect specific genes of Staphylococcus aureus ( nuc and sa442 ) and the encoding gene for methicillin resistance ( mecA ). Overall, 97 episodes (39%) were clinical-significant bloodstream infections. The prevalence of methicillin resistance of S. aureus was 24%. A favorable outcome (defined as clinical cure with resolution of signs and no evidence of recurrence or relapse at 12 weeks follow-up) was observed in similar proportions of episodes with (58%) or without (60%) PCR testing (p 0.8). In multivariate analyses, age and infection due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (adjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.99; and adjusted OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.12–8.65, respectively) were the unique factors independently associated with a favorable outcome. Among the 153 episodes of contaminated BCs, similar proportions received unjustified antibiotic therapy (PCR strategy: 17%, conventional testing: 10%; p 0.33). In a setting with a moderate level of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and relatively high contamination of BCs, real-time PCR testing was not beneficial compared to conventional methods.