USING REVERSE ARRANGEMENT TEST TO DETECT NON-MONOTONIC TRENDS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AND RELIABILITY TESTS

2008 
The limitation of the trend test in SPC is reviewed. The current Nelson's run test for the six or seven consecutive increasing or decreasing points cannot detect non-monotonic increasing or decreasing trend that is frequently encountered in industries. This paper proposes the reverse arrangement test (RAT) to replace the current SPC trend test rule in order to detect both non-monotonic and monotonic increasing or decreasing trends. The theory of RAT is reviewed and we point out the errors in the tables from a well-known and most frequently referenced paper on RAT. The corrected tables of accumulated probabilities for each total reverse arrangement for N = 3 to 12 are presented. The false alarm rate from RAT is verified with excellent accuracy by 108 data points simulating stable normal distributed process. Real examples from the semiconductor manufacturing illustrate that 7 non-monotonic increasing points can be detected by RAT with the same false alarm rate as for the 6 monotonic increasing trend, while sometimes none of the current WECO and Nelson's rules can detect such abnormal pattern. Applications of RAT in IC SPC and WLRC (Wafer Level Reliability Control) show RAT is much more powerful than conventional monotonic trend tests in detecting nonconformance.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    11
    References
    6
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []