MicroRNA‐139 is a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence and inhibits growth and migration of prostate cancer cells through cell cycle arrest and targeting IGF1R and AXL

BACKGROUND: We previously identified a panel of five microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with biochemical recurrence and metastasis following prostatectomy from prostate cancer patients using next-generation sequencing-based whole miRNome sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based validation analysis. In this study, we examined the mechanism of action of miR-139-5p, one of the downregulated miRNAs identified in the panel. METHODS: Using a cohort of 585 patients treated with radical prostatectomy, we examined the prognostic significance of miR-139 (dichotomized around the median) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. We validated these results using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. We created cell lines that overexpressed miR-139 to confirm its targets as well as examine pathways through which miR-139 may function using cell-based assays. RESULTS: Low miR-139 expression was significantly associated with a variety of prognostic factors in prostate cancer, including Gleason score, pathologic stage, margin positivity, and lymph node status. MiR-139 expression was associated with prognosis: the cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence and metastasis were significantly lower among patients with high miR-139 expression (P = .0004 and .038, respectively). Validation in the TCGA data set showed a significant association between dichotomized miR-139 expression and biochemical recurrence (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.82). Overexpression of miR-139 in prostate cancer cells led to a significant reduction in cell proliferation and migration compared with control cells, with cells arrested in G2 of cell cycle. IGF1R and AXL were identified as potential targets of miR-139 based on multiple miRNA-binding sites in 3'-untranslated regions of both the genes and their association with prostate cancer growth pathways. Luciferase assays verified AXL and IGF1R as direct targets of miR-139. Furthermore, immunoblotting of prostate cancer cells demonstrated IGF1R and AXL protein expression were inhibited by miR-139 treatment, which was reversed by the addition of miR-139 antagomir. Examination of the molecular mechanism of growth inhibition by miR-139 revealed the downregulation of activated AKT and cyclin D1, with upregulation of the CDK inhibitor p21. CONCLUSIONS: miR-139 is associated with improved prognosis in patients with localized prostate cancer, which may be mediated through downregulation of IGF1R and/or AXL and associated signaling pathway components.