The Association of Psychological Well-Being with Disablement Processes in a National Sample

OBJECTIVE: Objectives were to explore subgroups of individuals with differential disability trajectories and evaluate the protective effects of psychological well-being (i.e. hedonic and eudaimonic) in the presence of multiple disease conditions (or multimorbidity) and sociodemographic disadvantages. METHODS: Data come from the prospective longitudinal cohort study the Midlife Development in the United States (n = 3,904). Three waves of data spanning a 20-year period were used to identify subgroups with different disability trajectories. Subgroup membership was then modelled as a function of psychological well-being assessed at wave 1 of the study using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Three unique groups were identified: a normative group with initially low and slowly increasing levels of disability; a group with high levels of disability that was stable over time; and a group with moderate initial levels of disability that increased over time. Hedonic well-being at wave 1 was associated with membership in the risk groups relative to the normative group. CONCLUSION: Individuals may follow one of three disability pathways mostly as a function of multimorbidity. However, hedonic well-being was associated with having an advantageous disability trajectory regardless of multimorbidity status. Cultivating psychological well-being may improve disability outcomes in aging individuals.