SAFEGUARD PRESSURE ASSISTED DEVICE FOR LOCAL FEMORAL HEMOSTASIS IN NEUROENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES: A SINGLE CENTER STUDY OF 879 PATIENTS.

2020 
BACKGROUND Various vascular closure devices (VCDs) are available for local hemostasis after percutaneous transfemoral approach for neuroendovascular procedures but they have been associated with an increased complication rate and limitations to a re-puncture of the artery. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Safeguard® 24 cm pressure assisted device (Merit Medical, West Jordan, UT, USA) and the associated complications. METHODS From September 2016 to December 2019, 879 patients underwent neuroendovascular procedures via transfemoral approach using an introducer sheath ranging from 4 to 6-French and they were included in a prospective database. We registered the demographic characteristics and procedural factors. We evaluated the device failure and associated complications. RESULTS The Safeguard® was successful in 862 cases (98.1 %) with post-procedural local bleeding in 17 patients (1.9%). On univariate analysis, an association with local bleeding was observed with age >60 years (Odds ratio [OR] = 3.2, P = 0.04) and the use of an introducer sheath >4 F ([OR] = 3.1, P = 0.007). Female gender, antithrombotic medication and type of procedure (diagnostic or interventional) were not associated with local bleeding. On binary logistic regression analysis, there was association only for age >60 years ([OR] = 3, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION The Safeguard® 24 cm is safe and efficient. It is simple to use and it can be applied independently from vessel anatomic characteristics. It should though be used with caution in case of a femoral introducer sheath larger than 4 Fr and patients older than 60 years.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    21
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []