Some Remarks on the Discovery of ^{244}Md.

In two recent papers by Pore et al. and Khuyagbaatar et al., discovery of the new isotope ^{244}Md was reported. The decay data, however, are conflicting. While Pore et al. report two isomeric states decaying by α emission with E_{α}(1)=8.66(2)  MeV, T_{1/2}(1)=0.4_{-0.1}^{+0.4}  s and E_{α}(2)=8.31(2)  MeV, T_{1/2}(2)≈6   s, Khuyagbaatar et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 142504 (2020).PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.125.142504] report only a single transition with a broad energy distribution of E_{α}=(8.73-8.86)  MeV and T_{1/2}=0.30_{-0.09}^{+0.19}  s. The data published in Pore et al. are very similar to those published for ^{245m}Md [E_{α}=8.64(2), 8.68(2) MeV, T_{1/2}=0.35_{-0.16}^{+0.23}  s [V. Ninov, F. P. Hesberger, S. Hofmann, H. Folger, G. Munzenberg, P. Armbruster, A. V. Yeremin, A. G. Popeko, M. Leino, and S. Saro, Z. Phys. A 356, 11 (1996).ZPAHEX0939-792210.1007/s002180050141] ]. Therefore, we compare the data presented for ^{244}Md in Pore et al. with those reported for ^{245}Md in Ninov et al. and also in Khuyagbaatar et al. We conclude that the data presented in Pore et al. shall be attributed to ^{245}Md with small contributions (one event each) from ^{245}Fm and probably ^{246}Md.