Electrophysiological effects of bepridil and its quaternary derivative CERM 11888 in closed chest anaesthetized dogs: a comparison with verapamil and diltiazem

Abstract 1. The electrophysiological effects of bepridil, its quaternary derivative, CERM 11888 (methylpyrrolidinium bromide) (both 2.5 mg kg-1 i.v.) and those of verapamil and diltiazem (0.2 mg kg-1 i.v.) were studied in closed chest anaesthetized dogs at doses used in clinical studies. 2. The four drugs caused a bradycardia with the following order of potency: bepridil greater than CERM 11888 greater than diltiazem greater than verapamil. 3. All the compounds slowed conduction in the AV node, increased the refractory period (RP) and decreased Wenckebach rates with the following order: verapamil much greater than diltiazem greater than bepridil greater than CERM 11888. 4. Verapamil and diltiazem did not affect conduction or the RP in atria while bepridil weakly slowed the former and markedly increased the latter. CERM 11888 caused a lengthening of RP but this was a delayed effect. 5. In the ventricle, bepridil and CERM 11888 caused a small increase in the QRS and a more pronounced increase in the RP. Both compounds increased QTc but did not modify HV. Verapamil and diltiazem had no significant effects at the ventricular level. 6. Our results confirm that the main sites of action of calcium antagonists are the SA and AV nodes. Bepridil has a broader spectrum of activity and also acts at the atrial and ventricular levels. A comparison of the effects of bepridil with those of its quaternary derivative suggests the involvement of an intracellular action in the electrophysiological effects of bepridil.