Low peak bone mineral density in healthy lebanese subjects

Abstract Osteoporosis is a major public health problem in Western countries and is projected to have a similar impact in the Middle East. It has been suggested that peak bone mineral density (BMD), a major determinant of osteoporotic fractures later in life, may be lower in this part of the world compared with the Western world. However, subjects have not been randomly selected or systematically screened to rule out secondary causes of bone loss. The purpose of this study was to determine peak bone mass and lifestyle risk factors for bone loss in a randomly chosen sample of healthy Lebanese subjects from the greater Beirut area. Subjects 25–35 years of age were randomly selected from greater Beirut, which comprises one third of the Lebanese at large, and studied during the Fall of 1999. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine, hip, forearm, and total body. A questionnaire on lifestyle factors was administered to all subjects. Results were compared with the database of subjects from the USA provided by the manufacturer, and to the NHANES database for the total hip. Two hundred thirteen subjects were studied; 45 subjects rotated at all three centers for cross-calibration purposes. Peak BMD in Lebanese subjects was 0.2–0.9 SD below that of peak BMD in American subjects, depending on skeletal site, gender, and densitometer. These differences persisted after attempting to adjust for body size. Osteoporosis and osteopenia were more prevalent than in healthy young Americans. Height, weight, and total body fat were the most significant correlates of BMD/bone mineral content (BMC), accounting for 0.3–0.7 of the variance in bone mass measurement. Lifestyle factors had a very modest but significant contribution to bone mass variance. This is the first population-based study from the Middle East demonstrating that peak BMD is slightly lower in Lebanese subjects compared as with an established database from the USA. Due to the selection of relatively healthier subjects in our study than in the NHANES study, the actual differences between the two populations may be even greater. The impact of our findings on the epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in Lebanon remains to be determined.