Evaluation of the effects of using 3D - patient specific models of displaced intra - articular calcaneal fractures in surgery.

Abstract Background It was aimed to compare conventional surgery and three-dimensional (3D) model-assisted surgery used in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. Materials & Methods A total of 37 patients with unilateral calcaneal fractures were randomly divided into two groups as a conventional surgery group (n: 19) and a 3D model-assisted surgery group (n: 18). The preoperative, postoperative and last follow up angles of the Bohler and Gissane, calcaneal width and facet height were measured. The duration of the operation, blood loss volume, fluoroscopy usage, instrumentation time for both groups were recorded. Finally, the follow-up AOFAS scores were evaluated. A questionnaire was used to determine the perceptions of the resident doctors about the 3D model. Results The duration of the operation, blood loss volume, fluoroscopy usage, instrumentation time for 3D model-assisted surgery group were 83.3 ± 4.6 minutes, 83.6 ± 4.6 ml, 6.8 ± 1.4 times and 13.0 ± 0.8 weeks, and as for conventional group they were 130.0 ± 5.8 minutes, 105.1 ± 5.6 minutes, 11.7 ± 1.5 ml, 22.2 ± 2.4 times and 13.3 ± 0.8 weeks, respectively (p Conclusions Compared to the conventional group, the 3D model-assisted group provide successful intervention and reduce operation, instrumentation time and the fluoroscopy usage with less blood loss. Performing 3D-assisted surgery helps the quality of reduction during the surgery and stability of internal fixation to protect achieved reduction at follow-up more succesfully.