LOCKED INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION VS PLATING FOR DISPLACED AND SHORTENED MID-SHAFT CLAVICLE FRACTURES – A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED TRIAL

We undertook a prospective randomised trial to determine the outcome of locked intramedullary fixation vs. plating of displaced shortened mid-shaft clavicle fractures. The primary outcome measure was the Constant shoulder score, while secondary outcome measures included the Oxford shoulder score, union rate, and complication rates. Thirty-two patients were recruited to the trial; 17 randomised to locked intramedullary fixation and 15 randomised to plating. Mean age was 29.3years (13 to 53 years). Mean follow-up was 12.4 months (5 to 28 months). There was no significant difference in Constant scores (p = 0.365) and no significant difference in Oxford scores (p = 0.686). There was 100% union in both groups. In the intramedullary group, there was one case of soft tissue irritation that settled after the pin was removed, one pin backed out and had to be revised with another pin. There were three superficial wound infections resulting in plate removal and 8 plates (53%) were removed. Locked intramedullary fixation and plating are equally effective in the management of shortened displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures.