Cost-effectiveness of preferred fluids versus electrolytes in pediatric gastroenteritis.

BACKGROUND While electrolyte maintenance solution is recommended and commonly used in pediatric gastroenteritis, it can be more costly and less palatable than preferred fluids such as apple juice. OBJECTIVE To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of apple juice/preferred fluids versus electrolyte maintenance solution in reducing treatment failures in children in an emergency department from societal and health care perspectives. METHODS A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using clinical trial and chart data. All intervention, and direct and indirect costs were included, with a 14-day time horizon. Cost-effectiveness was examined by calculating the difference in mean number of treatment failures and mean cost/patient between treatment groups. The probabilistic point estimate and 95% confidence intervals for incremental costs and incremental effectiveness were determined. RESULTS The apple juice strategy was less costly than electrolytes with average per child savings of CAD $171 (95% CI $22 to $1097) from a societal perspective, and $147 (95% CI $23 to $1056) from a health care perspective. There were 0.08 fewer treatment failures per child (95% CI - 0.15 to - 0.02). The higher electrolyte maintenance solution cost was due to more frequent hospitalizations, ongoing care, and greater lost parental productivity due to additional medical visits. CONCLUSION Apple juice/preferred fluids strategy was dominant over electrolytes in the treatment of children with minimal dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis as this option yielded fewer treatment failures and a lower societal cost. Given the high prevalence of acute gastroenteritis, this approach may result in significant cost savings while leading to improved clinical outcomes.