Atrial Cannulation in Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support

Purpose Several centers have considered the potential benefits of atrial inflow cannulation to provide mechanical circulatory support (MCS) among pediatric patients with small or restrictive ventricles particularly in those with potential for myocardial recovery. Limited pediatric data are available on contemporary outcomes of atrial cannulation. We sought to describe the characteristics, complications, and outcomes of children supported with atrial cannulation using the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) ventricular assist device (VAD) database. Methods Data were collected from the ACTION VAD database for all patients who underwent VAD implantation via atrial cannulation from 8/16/2012 to 9/8/2020. Patient characteristics, VAD types, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Results Forty-one patients met the study criteria with 52 implants. Median age was 3.6 years (range 0.02 - 25.32), weight 13.6 kg (2.7-106), and BSA 0.6 (0.15 - 2.2). Diagnoses included dilated cardiomyopathy (42%), congenital heart disease (37%), transplant graft dysfunction (7%), restrictive and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (5% each). VAD indications were bridge to decision (42%), bridge to transplant (42%), and bridge to recovery (17%). Eighty-four percent of patients were INTERMACS 1 or 2, 44% were on ECMO, and 63% were mechanically ventilated. Devices utilized included Berlin Heart Excor (40%), paracorporeal continuous flow devices (38%), Heartware (19%) and one Heartmate 3. Median support duration was 43.5 days (range 0-307). Overall mortality was 22%. Twenty patients (49%) were successfully transplanted, 7 (17%) recovered, and 5 (12%) are still alive on the device. Adverse events included major bleeding (24%), stroke (12%), sepsis (10%), right heart failure requiring RVAD (5%), and one instance of pump thrombosis. Conclusion Atrial cannulation in pediatric MCS can be performed across a variety of anatomic substrates and age ranges with outcomes and complication rates that are comparable to left ventricular cannulation strategies. This method may be advantageous in certain circumstances including patients with small or restrictive ventricles, potential for myocardial recovery, or multiple prior sternotomies to minimize surgical dissection. Further studies are needed to delineate the ideal patient population and benefits of varying atrial cannulation techniques.