The efficacy of porous hydroxyapatite chips as gap filling in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in terms of clinical, radiological, and histological criteria

Abstract Purpose Hydroxyapatite (HA) does not fully degrade, which raises concerns about poor remodeling and incorporation into the bone after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The purpose of this study was to compare the results between gap filling with allogenous chip bone and HA chip after open-wedge HTO using propensity score matching and to analyze the radiological unabsorbed area of opening gaps histologically in HA using patients. Methods The matched variables were age, body mass index, sex, correction angle, and smoking status. After matching, the allogenous group and HA group included 33 patients each with two years of follow-up. The range of motion (ROM), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), mechanical axis (MA), tibial slope, osteoconductivity, and absorbability were evaluated and compared between both groups. Among the HA group, 20 patients underwent bone biopsy and histologically analyzed of the radiological unabsorbed area. Results The postoperative ROM, IKDC subjective score, and KOOS were similar in both groups. The osteoconductivities did not differ significantly. The absorbability in the HA group was significantly lower than allogenous group (59.6% vs. 22.6%, P  Conclusion The HA chips showed an inferior absorbability, however, a mature lamelliform bone was observed in significantly larger amounts than remnant HA in the radiological unabsorbed area. The allogenous bone chips and HA chips showed similar clinical and radiological results after open-wedge HTO.