Raw-data-based iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection: image quality of low-dose chest computed tomography examinations in 87 patients.

Abstract Objective The objective was to compare standard-dose chest computed tomography (CT) reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) versus low-dose images with FBP and raw-data-based iterative reconstruction. Methods Eighty-seven consecutive patients (46 male; mean age, 54.54±16.12; mean body mass index, 24.58±4.07) referred for initial chest CT with full-dose examinations [mean dose–length product (DLP), 183.37±44.13 mGy·cm] and follow-up chest CT with half-dose examinations (mean DLP, 91.08±23.81 mGy·cm) were included. The full-dose protocol was reconstructed with FBP; the half-dose protocol was reconstructed with FBP and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Noise and signal-to-noise ratio were compared using a paired Student's t test; subjective image quality and lesion conspicuity were compared using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Results Actual radiation dose of follow-up CT was about 50% (49.26%±2.62%) of standard-dose protocol. Compared to full-dose images with FBP, there was no significant difference in half-dose images with SAFIRE in the objective noise (ascending aorta: P =.38, descending aorta: P =.70, trachea on mediastinal images: P =.37) and SNR (ascending aorta: P =.14, descending aorta: P =.72, trachea on mediastinal images: P =.06) on mediastinal images. Noise was significantly lower ( P P P P P =.317) and lung images ( P =.614) of half-dose SAFIRE images versus full-dose FBP images. Lesion conspicuity was also similar. Subjective image quality was significantly lower on both mediastinal images ( P P P P P P =.003) on half-dose FBP versus full-dose FBP images. Conclusion Compared to full-dose CT images reconstructed with the conventional FBP algorithm, SAFIRE with three iterations could provide similar or better image quality at 50% less dose.