Safety Profile of Particle Embolization for Treatment of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

ABSTRACT Purpose To assess ischemic adverse events following particle embolization when used as a second-line embolic to coil embolization for treatment of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding(LGIB). Materials and Methods This single-institution retrospective study examined 154 procedures where embolization was attempted for LGIB. In 122 patients (64 males, mean age 69.9 years), embolization was successfully performed using microcoils in 73 procedures, particles in 34 procedures, and both microcoils and particles in 27 procedures. Particles were used as second-line only when coil embolization was infeasible or inadequate. Technical success was defined as angiographic cessation of active extravasation after embolization. Clinical success was defined as absence of recurrent bleeding within 30 days of embolization. Results Technical success for embolization of LGIB was achieved in 87.0% of cases (134/154), and clinical success was 76.1%(102/134) among technically successful cases. Clinical success was 82.2%(60/73) for coils alone and 68.9%(42/61) for particles +/- coils. Severe adverse events involving embolization-induced bowel ischemia occurred in 3 of 56 patients who underwent particle embolization +/- coils (5.3%) versus zero out of 66 patients when coils alone were used (P=0.09). In patients who had colonoscopy or bowel resection within 2 weeks of embolization, ischemic findings attributable to the embolization were found in 3 of 15 who underwent embolization with coils alone, versus 8 of 18 who underwent embolization with particles +/- coils (p=0.27). Conclusion Particle embolization for treatment of LGIB as second line to coil embolization was associated with a 68.9% clinical success rate and a 5.3% rate of ischemia-related adverse events.