염상섭이라는 타자와 프로문학의 내용형식 논쟁

This study is aimed at reinterpretation of the debate of Content and form, proletarian literature, acting by Kim－Gi－Jin and Park－Young－Hee, the korean proletarian literature theorist in the middle of the1920’s. Until now, this debate was understood that, this debate went to the triumphs of the park, the political elements was increasing and aesthetic elements was decreasing in the proletarian literature theory. But This debate was more complication. These hypotheses is evident once, if being highly analytic the debate of Yoem－Sang－Sub and Park－Young－ Hee, what happened in 1926. There are two important issues in this debate. First, there’s the matter of the novel and the representation. Yoem thought the novel is the mirror to the reproduce the real－life. By contrast, Park thought the novel is the devise of destroying the illusion, created by the mirror. The second, there’s the matter of the relation between novel and Social life. Yoem thought that Social life is the subject matter for creating novel. But Park thought that Social life is hidden historical truth, that is concealed by the bourgeois literature. Considering the date of Yoem and Park in 1926, Yoem－Sang－Sub’s proletarian literature theory could give rise to new understanding the debate of Content and form in proletarian literature. Kim－Gi－Jin hold the identical views on the subject of th Content and form in novel with Yoem’views. Kim thought the novel is the mirror to the reproduce the reallife. and Kim thought that Social life is the subject matter for creating novel. As a result, kim’s view is no way out of the framework of content and form in novel, the modern perspective of literature. On the contrary, Park’s view has a possibility for getting out of the framework of this modern perspective.