Comparison of Complications in Patients Receiving Different Types of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Retrospective Study in a Single Center in Switzerland.
2016
Objective Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has become “state of the art” in the management protocol for unconscious or sedated patients with intracranial pathologies; however, all current monitoring systems have significant drawbacks. We analyzed the complications of these monitoring devices as well as the risk factors for those complications. Methods We reviewed a total of 288 patients with ICP monitoring, i.e., 173 external ventricular drainage (EVD) and/or 123 intraparenchymatous catheters (IPCs). Placement of the IPC or EVD was performed by a standardized protocol according to fixed anatomical landmarks. Infections were diagnosed from positive cerebrospinal fluid cultures, positive devices cultures, and/or fever; hemorrhages were diagnosed by postprocedure computed tomography. Results Sixteen patients (9.2%) with an EVD and 1 patient (0.8%) with an IPC system experienced an infection ( P P Conclusions EVD is an indispensable device in neurosurgery. Unfortunately, it has a significantly high complication rate, mostly in relation to infections. Therefore, the indication of the device used to monitor ICP must be evaluated carefully. The antimicrobial-impregnated external catheter and silver-coated catheters might decrease the problem of infection.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
36
References
31
Citations
NaN
KQI