Experience with low‐dose oestrogen in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: a personal view

Objective To re-evaluate the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma with diethylstilboestrol (DES) in low dosage in relation to the degree of suppression of plasma testosterone. Patients and methods The study comprised 106 patients with advanced carcinoma of the prostate (89 with T3/4 M1 and 17 with T3/4 N0/1 M0) who were treated with 1 mg/day of DES. The response was assessed clinically and by the change in plasma prostate specific antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase, and plasma testosterone was monitored regularly. In a few patients it was possible to reduce the dose to 0.5 mg/day DES; in others, the initial response was not sustained and they were treated with an increased dose of DES or bilateral orchidectomy. Results Seventy patients (Group 1) showed a sustained response to 1 mg/day of DES (0.5 mg/day in three) and 50 remained in remission at a mean of 21 months of treatment. Of the 36 patients offered secondary treatment, 12 (Group 2) responded with a second remission. Only 27% of patients had mean testosterone levels in the castrate range (0–2 nmol/L) but most in Group 1 had mean levels of 10 nmol/L. Overall times to progression and death were comparable with the results of conventional monotherapy or combination treatment and complication rates were acceptable. Conclusion Low-dose oestrogen therapy (1 mg/day of DES) is cheap, effective and caused few side-effects, none of which was life-threatening. In many patients, only minimal suppression of the plasma testosterone was required and the response appeared to be qualitative, although there was considerable variation in the threshold of response. A randomized trial of oestrogen, in a minimal dose adjusted to the requirements of the individual patient, against conventional hormone treatment now seems justified.