Clinicopathological Factors Predicting Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival in Endometrial Cancer

1998 
Background: Byclarifying the significance of clinicopathological factors for retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis and survival of patients with endometrial cancer, we suggest ideas for optimal treatment of this disease. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 310 women with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. To evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis, age-adjusted and multivariable analyses were carried out for six clinicopatho­ logical factors including pathological grade, myometrial invasion, cervical invasion, peritoneal cytology, lymphatic permeation and vascular invasion. To evaluate survival, besides the above factors, a positive rate of metastasis of dissected retroperitoneal lymph nodes was included. Results: In 40 patients (13%) with nodal metastasis, the average positive rate of metastasis of dissected retroperitoneal lymph nodes was 22%. For retroperitoneal lymph nodemetastasis, the odds ratio of deep myometrial invasion, cervical invasion and severe lymphatic permeation were 5.97, 2.72 and 12.01, respectively. For survival, the hazard ratios of the positive rates of metastasis of dissected retroperitoneal lymph nodes(both 25% and <25%), positive peritoneal cytology and poor pathological grade were 7.10, 3.24, 3.82 and 3.27, respectively, and 5-year survival rates for them were 0, 50, 72 and 77%, respectively. Conclusions: For retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis, lymphatic permeation, deep myome­ trial invasion and cervical invasion were the independent prognostic factors. For survival, retroperitoneal lymph metastasis, poorpathological grades andpositive peritoneal cytology were the independent prognostic factors. The positive rate of metastasis of dissected retroperitoneal lymph metastasis playsan important rolein predicting survival of endometrial cancer. Lymph node biopsy is insufficient in treatment of this disease.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    16
    References
    21
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []