Heptanol But Not Fluoroacetate Prevents the Propagation of Spreading Depression in Rat Hippocampal Slices

1997 
Largo, Carlota, Geoffrey C. Tombaugh, Peter G. Aitken, Oscar Herreras, and George G. Somjen. Heptanol but not fluoroacetate prevents the propagation of spreading depression in rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 9–16, 1997. We investigated whether heptanol and other long-chain alcohols that are known to block gap junctions interfere with the generation or the propagation of spreading depression (SD). Waves of SD were triggered by micro-injection of concentrated KCl solution in stratum (s.) radiatum of CA1 of rat hippocampal tissue slices. DC-coupled recordings of extracellular potential ( V o) were made at the injection and at a second site ∼1 mm distant in st. radiatum and sometimes also in st. pyramidale. Extracellular excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were evoked by stimulation of the Schaffer collateral bundle; in some experiments, antidromic population spikes were evoked by stimulation of the alveus. Bath application of 3 mM heptanol or 5 mM hexanol completely and reversibly prevented the propagation of the SD-related potential shift (Δ V o) without abolishing the Δ V o at the injection site. Octanol (1 mM) had a similar but less reliably reversible effect. fEPSPs were depressed by ∼30% by heptanol and octanol, 65% by hexanol. Antidromic population spikes were depressed by 30%. In isolated, patch-clamped CA1 pyramidal neurons, heptanol partially and reversibly depressed voltage-dependent Na currents possibly explaining the slight depression of antidromic spikes and, by acting on presynaptic action potentials, also the depression of fEPSPs. Fluoroacetate (FAc), a putative selective blocker of glial metabolism, first induced multiple spike firing in response to single afferent volleys and then severely suppressed synaptic transmission (confirming earlier reports) without depressing the antidromic population spike. FAc did not inhibit SD propagation. The effect of alkyl alcohols is compatible with the idea that the opening of normally closed neuronal gap junctions is required for SD propagation. Alternative possible explanations include interference with the lipid phase of neuron membranes. The absence of SD inhibition by FAc confirms that synaptic transmission is not necessary for the propagation of SD, and it suggests that normally functioning glial cells are not essential for SD generation or propagation.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    57
    References
    73
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []