New Climatic Zones in Iran: A Comparative Study of Different Empirical Methods and Clustering Technique

Recently in agricultural and industrial sectors, researchers have started to classify the climate of a region using empirical methods and clustering. This study aims to compare four empirical approaches to climate classification (Thornthwaite and Mather, De Martonne, the Extended De Martonne, and the IRIMO (I.R. of Iran Meteorological Organization)) with Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering applied to the climate of Iran. The dataset used in this study comprises maximum and minimum temperatures and precipitation data of 356 weather stations extracted from IRIMO’s databases. Thirty-five synoptic weather stations are selected among 356 stations. These stations are selected regarding the best uniform distribution, elevation, windward and leeward sides of the mountain ranges, and availability of a continuous 50-year data (1966–2015). Compared with the other three empirical reference methods of climate classification, the Thornthwaite and Mather method emphasizes the role of water bodies and air masses in determining the climate type of a region. Highlighting these two factors is identified as the main advantage of this method over the other three. This advantage is the most noticeable for the highlands/mountainous regions, in the vicinity of the Zagros Mountains, and in the western regions of Iran. As a case in point, while in the De Martonne and the Extended De Martonne methods, the Zagros storm cell is climatically classified similar to patchy areas in Caspian Sea coastal zone, this cell is correctly identified as a separate zone in the Thornthwaite and Mather method. The results also reveal that the clusters obtained from Ward’s algorithm are comparable to those of empirical climate classifications, particularly Thornthwaite and Mather method.