Quantitative evaluation methods of tight reservoirs based on multi-feature fusion: A case study of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Liaohe Depression

2020 
Abstract The formation and development of tight oil reservoirs in the fourth member of the Shahejie Formation (Es4) in the Leijia region of the western sag of the Liaohe Depression are highly heterogeneous and influenced by several factors. The relationship between these variables is extremely complex. In order to avoid deviations caused by single factors and logging data for less drilling when regional tight oil reservoirs have been assessed, quantitative evaluation methods for tight reservoirs based on multi-feature fusion have been proposed. Hand-drawn maps of brittleness index, carbonate rocks thickness, fracture density, mean permeability, and mean porosity are gridded by the Kriging model accompanied by k-means clustering to determine the types of reservoir and classification interval. After that, two quantitative evaluation methods, the overlapping favourability method (OFM) and the principal component analysis (PCA), were used to analyze the five influence factors of the tight oil reservoirs. Finally, reservoir evaluation maps were generated by dividing the interval values into classes. Results show that the weights of the five variables calculated by the hybrid weight method (HWM) are 0.1100,0.4929, 0.0803, 0.2889, and 0.0279. The reservoirs in the study area are finally divided into four types, with the best reservoir types primarily distributed in well areas, such as A99, A82, A91, A78, and A9. At the same time, the main controlling factors for the creation of the reservoir have been analyzed; however, the thickness of carbonate rock in the study area plays a decisive role in the development of high-quality reservoirs. The brittleness index and fracture density can significantly improve the efficiency of the reservoir. Quantitative approaches can effectively and scientifically evaluate the tight reservoirs, which can be widely used.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    45
    References
    2
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []