UN peacebuilding - light footprint or friendly takeover?

Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW III. THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 1\. Trends in Peace Missions 1.1. The Evolution of Interventions 1.1.1. Military Occupation and Colonial Rule 1.1.2. Mandates and Trusteeships 1.1.3. Traditional Peacekeeping 1.1.4. Multidimensional Peacebuilding 1.1.5. Statebuilding and Nation-building 1.1.6. International Transitional Administration 1.1.7. Quo Vadis? 1.2. Descriptive Analysis of UN Peace Missions 1.2.1. Number of UN Peace Missions 1.2.2. Duration 1.2.3. Manpower 1.2.4. Resources 1.2.5. Peacekeeping and Peacebuilding 2\. The Research Question 2.1. Friendly Takeover 2.2. Light Footprint 2.3. Reconciling the Two Approaches 2.4. Context Matters IV. THE ANALYSIS 1\. Concept Specification 1.1. Definition of Peacebuilding and Case Selection 1.2. Operationalization and Descriptive Data 1.2.1. Defining the Outcome 1.2.1.1. Security 1.2.1.2. Statehood 1.2.2. Constructing a Measure of the Scale of Peace Missions 1.2.2.1. Duration 1.2.2.2. Manpower 1.2.2.3. Resources 1.2.2.4. Scale of the Peace Missions in the Sample 1.2.3. Constructing a Measure of the Scope of Peace Missions 1.2.3.1. Did External Actors Enforce Peace with Military Power? 1.2.3.2. Did External Actors Participate in Executive Policing? 1.2.3.3. Did External Actors Engage in Security Sector Reform? 1.2.3.4. Did External Actors Take on Executive Powers? 1.2.3.5. Did External Actors Take on Legislative Powers? 1.2.3.6. Did External Actors Shape the New Constitution? 1.2.3.7. Did External Actors Take on Judicial Powers? 1.2.3.8. Did External Actors Decisively Shape Economic Policies? 1.2.3.9. Scope of the Peace Missions in the Sample 1.2.4. A Combined Measure of Mission Intrusiveness 1.2.5. Trends of Mission Intrusiveness 2\. Two-Step fs/QCA Analysis 2.1. From QCA to Two-Step fs/QCA 2.2. Definition of Remote and Proximate Conditions 2.3. Calibration of Fuzzy Sets 2.4. The Fuzzy Set Data Sheet 3\. Analysis 3.1. fs/QCA Analyses for Necessary Conditions 3.2. Two-step fs/QCA Analyses for Sufficient Conditions 3.2.1. Two-Step Test of Sufficiency for the Outcome Security 3.2.2. Two-Step Test of Sufficiency for the Outcome Absence of Security 3.2.3. Two-Step Test of Sufficiency for the Outcome Statehood 3.2.4. Two-Step Test of Sufficiency for the Outcome Absence of Statehood 4\. Interpretation of the Results V. THE CASE STUDIES 1\. Case Study Kosovo 1.1. Historical Background 1.2. UNMIK Scale 1.2.1. Duration 1.2.2. Manpower 1.2.3. Resources 1.3. UNMIK Scope 1.3.1. Temporary Variation of Intrusiveness 1.3.2. Spatial Variation of Intrusiveness 1.3.3. Technical Analysis 1.3.3.1. Peace Enforcement 1.3.3.2. Executive Policing 1.3.3.3. Security Sector Reform 1.3.3.4. Executive 1.3.3.5. Legislature 1.3.3.6. Constitution 1.3.3.7. Judiciary 1.3.3.8. Economic Policies 1.4. Intervention Society – Kosovo as a Case of Friendly Takeover 1.4.1. Interaction between the Kosovo Representatives and UNMIK 1.4.2. Effects of the UNMIK Presence on State-Society Relations 1.4.3. Interaction between UNMIK and the People 1.5. Analysis of Statehood 1.5.1. Ownership of the Outcome: Who Provides Statehood? 1.5.1.1. Is Kosovo a Sovereign State after Independence? 1.5.2. Quality of Statehood 1.5.2.1. Provision of Security – UNMIK as a Security Guarantee 1.5.2.2. Institutional Capacities and Quality of Welfare 1.5.2.2.1. Government Effectiveness, Bureaucratic Quality, and Corruption 1.5.2.2.2. Rule of Law 1.5.2.2.3. Democracy 1.5.2.2.4. Service Provision and Social Welfare 1.5.2.2.5. Economic Performance 1.5.2.3. Shared Political and Ethnic Identity 2\. Case Study Liberia 2.1. Historical Background 2.2. UNMIL Scale 2.2.1. Duration 2.2.2. Manpower 2.2.3. Resources 2.3. UNMIL Scope 2.3.1. Technical Analysis 2.3.1.1. Peace Enforcement 2.3.1.2. Executive Policing 2.3.1.3. Security Sector Reform 2.3.1.4. Executive 2.3.1.5. Legislature 2.3.1.6. Constitution 2.3.1.7. Judiciary 2.3.1.8. Economic Policies 2.3.2. Spatial and Temporary Variation of Intrusiveness 2.4. Intervention Society – Liberia as a Case of Light Footprint 2.4.1. Interaction between the Government of Liberia and UNMIL 2.4.2. Effects of the UNMIL Presence on State-Society Relations 2.4.3. Interaction between UNMIL and the People 2.5. Analysis of Statehood 2.5.1. Ownership of the Outcome: Who Provides Statehood? 2.5.1.1. Liberia’s Sovereignty 2.5.2. Quality of Statehood 2.5.2.1. Provision of Security – UNMIL as a Security Guarantee 2.5.2.2. Institutional Capacities and Quality of Welfare 2.5.2.2.1. Government Effectiveness, Bureaucratic Quality, and Corruption 2.5.2.2.2. Rule of Law 2.5.2.2.3. Democracy 2.5.2.2.4. Service Provision and Social Welfare 2.5.2.2.5. Economic Performance 2.5.2.3. Shared Political and Ethnic Identity and State-Society Relations 3\. Conclusion from Case Studies VI. CONCLUSION VII. ANNEX BIBLIOGRAPHY