Attentional Focus Manipulations Affect Naming Latencies of Neutral But Not of Incongruent Stroop Trials

People are slower and more error-prone when indicating the color of incongruent color words compared to that of neutral stimuli. This Stroop effect results from the concurrent semantic analysis of the word stimulus. It has long been considered a prime example of the automaticity of semantic activation. However, coloring as well as cuing only a single letter both reduce the Stroop effect to the point of being absent. Proposed underlying mechanisms include the blocking of semantic activation, an improved selectivity between the interfering stimulus dimensions, and slowed color processing. In order to test the validity of these differing accounts of the single-letter Stroop effect, we compared vocal responses to standard and single-letter Stroop stimuli in two experiments. Irrespective of whether participants maintained a wide (Experiment 1) or a narrow (Experiment 2) attentional focus, both single-letter coloring and single-letter cuing increased reaction times to neutral Stroop stimuli but left those to in...