Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration

N. Moser,Nadège Lemeunier,D. Southerst,Heather M. Shearer,K. Murnaghan,Deborah Sutton,Pierre Côté

Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration

2018

N. Moser
Nadège Lemeunier
D. Southerst
Heather M. Shearer
K. Murnaghan
Deborah Sutton
Pierre Côté

Purpose To update findings of the 2000–2010 Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders (Neck Pain Task Force) on the validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk adult patients with blunt trauma to the neck.

Keywords:

Medicine
Surgery
Physical therapy
Clinical prediction rule
Spine injury
Blunt trauma
Validity
Neck pain
task force
Neurosurgery
cervical spine injury
research evaluation

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations