Comparison of three surgical fixation methods for dual-bone forearm fractures in older children: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of dual ESIN (D-ESIN) fixation, hybrid fixation, and open reduction and dual plate (d-plate) fixation in the treatment of dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10–16 years. Materials and methods 137 patients with dual-bone forearm fractures (48 patients in the D-ESIN group, 45 patients in the hybrid group, and 44 patients in the d-plate group) were reviewed. Duration of surgery, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy, and duration of postoperative immobilisation were recorded. Radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rate were also recorded. Results Surgeries and incisions were significantly shorter, and less intraoperative blood loss occurred, in the hybrid group than the d-plate group ( P P P  = 0.003). The union rate of the radius was similar in all three groups ( P  = 0.403). No significant difference in the union rate of the radius or ulna was observed among groups at 6 months postoperatively ( P  = 0.052). The mean union time was notably later in the D-ESIN group than in the hybrid and d-plate groups. However, no significant difference in functional outcome or complication rate was observed among the three groups ( P  = 0.822 and P  = 0.912). Conclusion Hybrid fixation was superior in terms of the duration of surgery, intraoperative use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative immobilisation, delayed union of the ulna, and bone union time. Therefore, hybrid fixation is a safe and effective treatment for dual-bone forearm fractures in children aged 10–16 years.