Student pharmacist opioid consultations with standardized limited English proficiency patients: A pre-post educational intervention study

Abstract Background and purpose This study explored the effect of a structured educational intervention for student pharmacists to counsel limited English proficiency (LEP) patients on risks and safety of opioid medications for chronic pain. Specific aims were to compare 2018 pre-intervention versus 2019 post-intervention groups regarding: (1) dose and side effects discussed, (2) opioid risks and safety measures covered, and (3) LEP specific communication practices. Educational activity and setting Third-year student pharmacists (P3s) in a required communications course consulted LEP standardized patients (SPs) on opioid medications in 2018 and 2019. An educational intervention for the 2019 P3s consisted of a 50-min lecture, pre-lab instructions about techniques for communication about opioid risks and safety, and for LEP specific communication stressing teach-back. All consultations in the pre- and post-intervention phases were video recorded and quantitatively coded for verbal and non-verbal communication skills. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were conducted on data. Findings Twenty-three consultations were recorded in 2018 for the pre-intervention phase and 49 consultations were recorded in 2019 for the post-intervention phase. Only 17% of students in the pre- intervention phase called the medication an “opioid” or “narcotic” in the consultation as compared to 84% in the post-intervention phase. While 100% of students in the post-intervention phase used teach-back, only 61% did so in the pre-intervention group. Significant differences between the two groups were observed for minimizing dependency and overdose, offering naloxone, teach-back, integrating a patient handout into the consultation, and discussing use of alternate pain medications.