Resuscitation in general medical wards: who decides?
2012
Aims and objectives. To investigate nurse experiences and attitudes regarding resuscitation while focusing on intentional avoidance of action during a futile cardiac arrest.
Background. Nurses often lack the legal and clinical authority to make resuscitation decisions; however, in cases where they believe that resuscitation would be futile, they may elect to delay/avoid the initiation of resuscitation as a non-confrontational method of achieving the desired endpoint, thus essentially transferring the final resuscitation decision from the physician to the nurse.
Design and methods. An anonymous questionnaire survey conducted among a convenience sample of 122/142 nurses from five medical wards in two Jerusalem hospitals.
Results. Nearly one-fifth (19/117) of participants reported non-initiation of a futile resuscitation. Nurses who chose not to initiate futile resuscitations were those who scored higher on the Support Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Questionnaire, those that had previously been consulted by a doctor regarding the initiation of resuscitation and those that expressed a desire to be a part of a multidisciplinary team focused on resuscitation decision-making. No other variables seemed to affect this outcome.
Conclusions. Nurses are often excluded from the resuscitation decision-making process despite their desire to participate. Delayed initiation/avoidance of resuscitation is being actively practiced by some nurses.
Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses should be given the opportunity to become an essential component of resuscitation decision-making to avoid the pre-emption of medical resuscitation decisions.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
26
References
6
Citations
NaN
KQI