Workplace Monitoring of Refractory Ceramic Fiber in the United States

Abstract This paper summarizes data from a comprehensive workplace exposure monitoring program for refractory ceramic fiber (RCF) conducted since 1990, including data collected under a 5-year consent agreement (1993–1998) between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Refractory Ceramic Fibers Coalition. It presents additional data and analyses, which complement an earlier article published in this journal (L. D. Maxim et al., 1997, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 26, 156–171). As part of this exposure monitoring program, data were collected at plants operated by RCF manufacturers and at customer facilities. Beginning in 1993, at least 720 samples (each sample consisting of one or more cassettes) were collected annually, distributed according to a stratified random sampling plan. The strata consisted of workers in eight functional job categories (FJCs) at manufacturing and customer plants. Time-weighted average (TWA) and task length average data were gathered and analyzed using phase contrast optical microscopy and (for a subset of samples) transmission electron microscopy methods. Data on respirator usage (by type) were also collected. Statistical analysis indicates that there are significant differences in TWA fiber concentrations (exposure) among FJCs (installation, finishing, and removal categories have the highest average concentrations), that workplace concentration data are approximately lognormally distributed, and that weighted average fiber concentrations decreased over the period from 1990 to 1998—although trend curves leveled out as exposures have decreased and further improvements became more difficult. Material differences exist in exposure between RCF manufacturers and their customers (largely because the mix of jobs differ), but these differences have narrowed over the years. Respirator usage varies with exposure. Respirator data are used to derive improved estimates of actual worker exposure. Alternative criteria for selecting FJCs for control efforts are defined and illustrated. Lessons learned for future monitoring efforts are summarized.