Food Insecurity and the Risk of HIV Acquisition: Findings From Six Sub-Saharan African Countries, 2015-2017

Background: We assessed the associations between severe food insecurity (SFI) and HIV risk in six sub-Saharan African countries. Methods: Data from nationally representative Population-based HIV Impact Assessments (PHIAs) in Zambia, Eswatini, Lesotho, Uganda, and Tanzania and Namibia were used. SFI was defined as having no food in the house at least three times in the past month. Recent HIV infection was identified using the HIV-1 LAg avidity assay, with viral load (>1000 copies/ml) and antiretroviral data. Logistic regression was conducted to assess correlates of SFI. Poisson regression was conducted on pooled data, stratified by sex and adjusted by country, urbanicity, wealth quintile and age, to determine the association of SFI with recent HIV infection and risk behaviors. All analyses were done using weighted data. Findings: Of the 112,955 survey participants aged 15-59, 10·3% lived in households reporting SFI. SFI was most common in poor, urban, woman-headed households with many dependents. Among women, SFI was associated with a two-fold increase in risk of recent HIV infection (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 2·04, 95% CI 1·04-3·98), and receipt of food support was protective (aRR 0·36, 95% CI 0·14-0·91), associations not observed among men. SFI was also associated with transactional sex (aRR 1·29, 95% CI 1·17-1·41), a history of forced sex (aRR 1·42, 95% CI 1·16-1·74), and condom-less sex with a partner of unknown or positive HIV status (aRR 1·08, 95% CI 1·02-1·14) in all women, and intergenerational sex (sexual partner ≥10 years older) in women aged 15-24 (aRR 1·23, 95% CI 1·03-1·46). Interpretation: The findings demonstrate that food insecurity increases risk for HIV acquisition. Worsening food scarcity due to climactic extremes could imperil HIV epidemic control, while food support programs might mitigate this risk. Funding Information: President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under the terms of cooperative agreement #U2GGH001226. Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: Written informed consent/assent was documented via electronic signature, with witnesses verifying consent for illiterate individuals. The PHIA protocol and data collection tools were approved by national ethics committees for each country, and the institutional review boards at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the University of California, San Francisco in the case of Namibia.