High performance approach for water level forecasting in Yom River basin of Thailand

2021 
Analyses of average monthly water level (AMWL) time series (April 2007 - March 2020) at four water level measurement stations (Y.31, Y.20, Y.1C, Y.37) for wet and dry seasons in the Yom River basin of Thailand. Using Box-Jenkins method, eight best-fit seasonal ARIMA models for one hydrological year forecasting for wet and dry seasons of AMWL were selected; among from twenty-four possible models, by minimum values of AIC, SBIC RMSE, and MAPE. Besides, The comparisons with two benchmark models, Holt-Winters’ Seasonal additive method, and Seasonal Naive method were applied. Results indicated that: The four selected SARIMA models for wet seasons of Y.31, Y20, Y1C, and Y.37 are SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,0,0)[6], SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,0,0)[6], SARIMA(1,1,2)(1,0,0)[6], and SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,0,0)[6], respectively. While the models for dry seasons are SARIMA(0,1,1)(2,0,0)[6], SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,0,1)[6], SARIMA(1,1,1)(2,0,0)[6], and SARIMA(1,0,0)(1,0,1)[6]. The forecasting performance are the minimum values of RMSE and MAPE between SARIMA and the benchmark models. The SARIMA model is the best approach for Y.31 Station [Wet Season], Y.31 Station [Dry Season], and Y.37 Station [Dry Season], while the best method for Y.20 Station [Wet Season], Y.1C Station [Wet Season], Y.37 Station [Wet Season], Y.20 Station [Dry Season], and Y.1C Station [Dry Season] is Holt-Winters’ seasonal additive method. The upstream station (Y.31 station) has higher accuracy than the downstream station (Y.37 station) due to human activities that disturb hydrological changes. Furthermore, the dry season forecasting is more accurate than the wet season.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    0
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []