Correlation of abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography scans with second‐ or third‐look laparotomy in patients with ovarian carcinoma

Abstract To determine the best noninvasive means of evaluating response in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma, 50 abdominal ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed in clinically disease-free ovarian cancer patients. The scans were correlated with the results obtained at a subsequent second- or third-look laparotomy. CT and US were not complementary, and only metastases larger than 2 cm were detected. The overall positive predictive value of nonconcordant scans was 57% compared with 100% for concordant CT and US (95% confidence limits: 18.4–90.1 and 29.2–100%, respectively). The corresponding negative predictive values were 45 and 47% (30.2–59.9 and 30.4–61.2%, respectively), if undetected microscopic disease was classified as a false-negative result. The negative predictive value of US and CT increased only to 60% in both cases, if undetected microscopic disease was registered as a true-negative result. Compared with the pelvic examination CT and US added positive information for 4 of 22 (18%) patients with macroscopic residual disease. In this study neither CT nor US was sensitive enough to preclude second-look laparotomy.