Survival Benefit and Efficiency of Low Dose Decitabine With CEG Regimen Compared to Decitabine Alone in the Elderly MDS - A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Abstract Background Decitabine are used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but none trials reported overall survival improvement. Methods High-risk MDS and MDS transformed AML (sAML) patients (IPSS-R > 4.5, age above 60 years) in 6 medical centers of China were treated and compared a new regimen (decitabine with CEG) consisted of low dose decitabine (15 mg/m2, days 1-3), low dose etoposide (30 mg/m2, days 4,6,8,10,12), cytarabine (10 mg/m2 per day, days 4-12) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, 5ug/kg, adjusted by patients’ WBC level, 12 hours prior to decitabine administration) with decitabine alone. The endpoints were death and disease progression. Results The baseline characteristics of these 2 groups were equivalent and none patients received prior chemotherapy. The treatment response rate (P= .048) and progression free survival (PFS, P = .030) all demonstrated significant improvement compared with decitabine alone. Decitabine with CEG regimen had attained a CR rate of 45.7%, a median OS of 36 (19-53) months and a median PFS of 34 (16.7-51.3) months in high-risk MDS patients, a CR rate of 40% in sAML. While decitabine alone only attained a median OS of 26 (24.5-27.5) months and a CR rate of 18.2% as well as a median progression free survival of 20 (17.6-22.4) months in MDS patients. Treatment response to CR or PR and TP53 mutation were 2 prognostic factor for OS and PFS in decitabine with CEG regimen. Conclusion Decitabine with CEG regimen showed some promising advantage in elderly, high-risk MDS.