ICE1 promotes the link between splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

The DNA in our cells contains the hereditary information that makes each of us unique. Molecules called mRNAs are copies of this information and are used as templates for making proteins. When a strand of incorrectly copied mRNA, or one including errors from the original DNA template, is recognized, our cells destroy the mRNA to prevent it from producing a damaged protein. Organisms from yeast to humans have evolved a mechanism for finding and destroying faulty mRNAs, called mRNA surveillance. Animals are particularly reliant on mRNA surveillance, as their proteins are often made from cutting and pasting together mRNA from different portions of DNA, in a process known as splicing. Despite being a vital process, we still lack a good understanding of how mRNA surveillance works. Now, Baird et al. used human kidney cells that produced an error-containing mRNA that could be tracked. To investigate how efficient RNA surveillance is under different conditions, the levels of individual proteins were reduced one at a time. By tracking the amount of faulty mRNA, it was possible to find out if a single protein plays a role in human mRNA surveillance. If the number of faulty mRNAs is high when a protein is reduced, it suggests that this protein may be involved in mRNA surveillance. Baird et al. screened more than 21,000 proteins, the majority of proteins made in human cells. Many of the proteins that stood out as important in mRNA surveillance were the ones already known to be relevant in yeast and worm cells. But the experiments also identified new proteins that appear to play a role specifically in human RNA surveillance. One of the proteins, ICE1, is essential for the relationship between mRNA splicing and mRNA surveillance. Without ICE1, the mRNA surveillance machinery can no longer find and destroy faulty mRNAs. Nearly one-third of genetic diseases are caused by mutations that result in faulty mRNAs, which can be detected by mRNA surveillance pathways. Depending on the disease, destroying these error-containing mRNAs can either improve or worsen disease symptoms. A better understanding of the factors that control human RNA surveillance could one day help to develop treatments that affect mRNA surveillance to improve disease outcomes.